Russell Cruse
  • Home
  • The Rothko Room
    • Writing The Rothko Room
    • The Rothko Room Characters
    • The Council
    • The Real Rothko Room
    • Rothko Room Covers
    • The Rothko Room Music
    • The Rothko Room Puzzles
    • Locations in The Rothko Room
    • Waifs & Strays >
      • Churchill
      • The Origin of The Council
      • The First Meeting of The Council
  • Books
    • Head Count
    • The Circling Song
  • Weblog
  • Comments
  • Ukulele Stuff
  • Weblog Selections

Genreation X

25/6/2011

1 Comment

 
I recently sent a submission, the terms of which required me to inform the publisher of the genre of the work I was submitting.  So once again, I fall at the first hurdle.  Now, this is not a plug or a ruse to get you to read The Circling Song (although you’ll notice I’m not stopping you) but I would be curious to know what other people think about which genre to assign to it. 

I could, of course suggest that it’s “genre-free” and so is classed as “Literary Fiction” but I don’t think that would work. Not because it isn’t superbly crafted but because, far from being “genre-free” it may well be “genre-saturated”.

You see, I have trouble with genres.   When I was a boy, had anyone asked me, I would have replied that, to my knowledge, there were two genres: fiction and non-fiction.  As I grew older, I realised that this was foolish and that, in fact, fiction could be subdivided into “comedy” and “tragedy”.

Then I learned that this rule was not always hard and fast and that you could have, in either of these, a practically infinite number of genres: Romance, Adventure and Mystery.  I did say “practically”.

There were, of course, fables, ghost stories and other “tall tales” to delight and intrigue but these were not genres, as such – merely aspects of the other three.  As an aside,  I think growing up in the rational, technologically confident nineteen fifties and sixties meant that any ghost stories I read turned out to have rational, technological explanations for spooky goings-on.  I had yet to encounter the full frontal Gothic romances of Poe, Lovecraft, M.R. James and others and, when I did, I was often struck by the sheer foolishness of them – except The Monkey’s Paw …(shivers)

Science fiction was popular, of course but we were steered away from the pulps and encouraged to read the more “literary” works of such as Wells and Wyndham, which were still classed as “adventure” or “mystery”.

If there was anything that signified a genre it would have been the location of the setting of the story.  So there would be westerns, jungle tales, sea stories, outer-space stories, war stories, and what-have-you. 

War stories could be set in the present, the recent past, the distant past or even the future.  The present would be unlikely, unless you count the cold war, in which case the protagonists would be spies so that would count as “adventure”.  If they were set in the past, it would most likely be the fairly recent past.  A “war story” always meant that it was set in World War II. Anything between twentieth and eighteenth century would also be adventure and only when the combatants donned armour or tights would it be classed as “historical”.  Togas etc would be “Tales of Greece and Rome” and before then, would be “biblical adventure”, whether it was biblical or not.  Anything involving helmets with horns and wings were “legends”.  Stories of future wars (not that I can remember any at that time) would have been called science fiction adventures.

The Circling Song plays out in Flanders between 1914 and 1918 and the main character is a soldier in combat.  There are accounts of a number of actions including the battles of Loos, Passchendaele and the Somme.  So that makes it a war story, doesn’t it? 

But isn’t early twentieth century now classed as “historical”?  And, during the course of the  story, two of the other main characters fall in and their relationship is a fundamental feature of the plot.  I wonder if that makes it a romance?  Certainly, in the original sense of the word, it is a romance but in the more modern sense, too, romance figures prominently.  I suppose I might get away with “historical romance” were it not for the core plot.

I had recognised some time ago that it was mere chance that kept Einstein out of the trenches and I often wondered how many brilliant young men – geniuses, perhaps -  had died in the mud of Flanders, their promise unfulfilled.  I know that, at this crucial time, mathematics and some theories of physics were beginning to scrape away at quantum mechanics and wondered how the world would be now if some form of unifying theory had been postulated by one of these young men.  

My main character, Henry Lawrence is one such.  His way of perceiving the world is governed entirely by mathematics and his understanding of the order to be found in the chaos of war leads him to some unlikely and startling conclusions that will impact on the lives of all the other characters and, indeed of everyone in the world.  This, I fear, is science fiction.

So what did I put on the submission?  Well, it wasn’t “Historical, Romantic, Science-Fiction, Wartime Adventure Mystery in Epistolary Style…” 

But should it have been…?

1 Comment
Mary Vensel White link
25/6/2011 01:19:20 am

I'm afraid you're stuck with "literary fiction," because of the depth and range of the story,, and the mastery with which it's written. Although if I were you, I'd be happy with historical fiction if they thought it would sell better. Because it's one of my authonomy favorites, I'd buy it even if you labeled it science fiction, and that's saying a lot for me :-).

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Follow this blog

    RSS Feed

    UK Amazon Kindle Forum's group-authors-bookshelf book montage
    UK Amazon Kindle Forum 222 members
    Somewhere else for those who hang around on the official Amazon Kindle Forum to slouch around.

    Our group-authors-bookshelf shelf



    View this group on Goodreads »

    Archives

    November 2015
    August 2014
    May 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011

    Categories

    All
    A Clockwork Orange
    Alice Cooper
    American Literature
    Andrew Mitchell
    Anthony Burgess
    Blogging
    Book Cover
    Cover Design
    Crossword
    Eastwood
    Editing
    Emperor's New Clothes
    English
    English Language
    Films
    Frazier
    Gary Barlow
    Godfrey Bloom
    Homeless
    Homeless Man
    Homophones
    Internet Down
    John Farris
    Julian Fellowes
    Kelsey Grammer
    Language
    Left-Wing
    Literary Fiction
    Lord Mcalpine
    Mark Rothko
    Nomophilia
    Nomophobia
    Patrick O'Brian
    Pleb
    Politics
    Prejudice
    Pretentious
    Promoting Literature
    Publishing
    Raimi
    Reliance On Mobile Phones
    Richard Matheson
    Self-publishing
    Semiotics
    Spin
    Twitter
    Without The Internet
    Writing


Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.